200 Unmarked, Lost Graves Found in Old Cemetery

January 19th, 2011

The J.S. Clark Cemetery had its first burial in the late 1950s and eventually grew into a 10-acre burial ground in southern Ouachita Parish.  Sadly, as happens to many older graveyards, it fell into disuse and disrepair over the years and as its original owners passed on.

The cemetery was eventually acquired by the Ouachita Parish Police Jury, who – with the concerted efforts of District D Police Juror Dr. Ollibeth Reddix – has been working on its rehabilitation.  Last year the Police Jury set aside $108,000 to put towards improvements to Clark Cemetery.

Along with appearance, the plan was to work on drainage control.  To do so, they needed to learn more about what was below the ground.  It was known – through the cemetery records – that many more people had been buried in Clark Cemetery than visible headstones showed.  Exactly where, however, was not so easily determined.

Working under consulting engineer, Tom Holtzcraw's, plan, $21,000 of those funds were used to hire an Ohio company, Ground Penetrating Radar Services to help them find unmarked graves so they could move forward in devising a drainage system and plotting possible further expansion.

On January 10, the company began its work, starting with a 6-acre area of the grounds using the radar cart and GPS coordinates to find and mark the long-lost graves.

It was no surprise to the crew or the Police Jury that missing graves were found, but everyone was a bit taken aback to realize that 200 unmarked graves lay beneath the leaf-strewn ground.

At this time, water-filled ditches are prohibiting some of the work and more ground needs to be covered.  There is no telling how many graves will be "unearthed" through this project, but the Police Jury and especially Dr. Reddix should be applauded for their efforts to preserve a piece of Ouachita Parish's past and honor its past residents by making sure they are never again forgotten.

The Body Hidden in the Garden

March 25th, 2010

The famed Bank of England isn't the first place that comes to mind when one thinks of burial spots. However, what is now the Garden Court – built in the late 1700s – indeed was once hallowed ground in which bodies were interred.

The Bank was founded in 1694 and is the center of the United Kingdom's financial system. Its headquarters has sat in London's main financial district, on Threadneedle Street, since 1734. The present-day building was built there after the lease had run out on their Grocer's Hall location; the Bank's home for eleven years. At the lease's end it was decided to construct the new Bank on the former home and gardens of the Bank's first Governor, Sir John Houblon (1632-1712), who was interred, upon his death, in the church at St. Christopher-le-Stocks, which were adjacent to Sir John's home.

In 1781, by an Act of Parliament, the church and churchyard (cemetery) of St. Christopher-le-Stocks came into the Bank's possession. The parish of St. Christopher-le-Stocks, was, at that time, absorbed – along with five other parishes – into nearby St. Margaret Lothbury.

The first record to be found on St. Christopher-le-Stocks is dated at 1282, though its actual dedication date is in question. The original church having burned in the Great London Fire of 1666, it was rebuilt in 1671. Though the Bank claimed the church and churchyard in 1781, it was not until 1867 that the human remains of the old church's former parishioners were re-interred in Nunhead Cemetery in South East London.

The church's former graveyard became the Bank's famed Garden Court, a lovely area dotted with centuries-old lime trees and flowering rhododendrons that covers nearly three acres. The Garden Court also boasts a fountain, constructed in 1852 by then-governor Thomas Hankey, that sprays water from tanks located in the Bank, which are themselves supplied by a pure 330' deep artesian well.

Though the church was no longer operational, and the churchyard, then, no longer used, the hallowed ground was dug into one last time in 1798 for an unusual burial. One which was, then, forgotten until renovations uncovered a strange lead coffin in 1933; one so large that when it was moved to Nunhead Cemetery, it had to be placed in the catacomb as it was too large to fit in any of the vaults.

This last and unofficial resident of the former St. Christopher-le-Stocks cemetery was one William Daniel Jenkins, an employee of the Bank of London who succumbed to an unusual illness at the age of thirty-one in 1798.

Jenkins had worked at the Bank for nine years as a clerk and had made friends there. It was these very friends that carried out his dying wish – to ensure that his body, disfigured by the rare disease he eventually succumbed to – would not be stolen by grave robbers.

Though reports indicate that Jenkins's mind had begun to deteriorate and that he was consumed by a plaguing fear of his body being stolen by local surgeons or the goons they hired to carry out their grisly work, his fears were not at all unfounded.

During this time, cadavers were difficult – if not impossible – to come by for local, would-be doctors and surgeons, and those scientists that would experiment on the human body. This was known as "The Resurrection Times", a dark period in England's history that lasted from around 1750-1832; it was then that the passage of the Warburton Anatomy Act brought an end to the body-snatching.

The need for fresh bodies drove hundreds of lower-class citizens and low-class criminals to take on the trade of "sack-em-up gentlemen", selling the bodies they harvested to the highest bidder. Profits became quite high in the gruesome business; enough so that some individuals took to murder to more easily – and quickly – acquire bodies to sell.

Jenkins had reason to fear enough by the very nature of his dying, but his concerns were compounded by the fact that he had physical anomalies that scientists were eager to learn more about. Some were so eager to dissect Jenkins' lifeless body that bids had already been put out before he even drew his last breath.

Furthering Jenkins's apprehensions, no doubt, was hearing the tale of Charles Byrne, the Irish Giant, who was stolen by anatomist and famed surgeon, John Hunter, before his friends had a chance to bury him in the Irish sea in 1783; the giant's remains now reside in the Hunterian Museum.

Daniel Jenkins suffered from a condition - known as acromegaly - that caused his height to increase rapidly and, at his death, stood at an astonishing 6' 7 ½" tall. Two hundred guineas had already been proffered by some scientists for the chance to poke around in Daniel's remains, and so – at his death – Daniel's friends requested permission from the Bank Directors to bury Daniel on the Bank site in the old churchyard. They allowed it, and the young man was quietly buried by his friends early one morning before the start of business.

Fast-forward some one-hundred thirty-five years, and workers excavating the Garden Court area for renovations and additions to the old Bank stumbled upon an 8' lead box in the far eastern corner of the garden, buried 8 1/2' underground. A metal plate told the workers it was the coffin of Mr. Jenkins. It read:

Mr William Danl. Jenkins. Died 24 March 1798, Aged 31

Daniel Jenkins had, it seemed, escaped the clutches of the ghouls and body-snatchers. His remains were moved, along with the long-vacated others of this old churchyard, to Nunhead Cemetery.


(Click here to see a photo of the unearthed coffin; from the "Bank Giant" page of the Bank of London Museum website.  Daniel's coffin photograph and a story of his after-death tale are on display at the museum.)

Taphophile Book Review: Mortician Diaries

March 23rd, 2010

I do not know exactly what I was expecting from 80 year-old June Nadle's memoirs about her decades in the funeral business, Mortician Diaries:The Dead-Honest Truth from a Life Spent with Death, but I was charmed to find her a tender yet strong, sensible, and introspective woman who - rather than be made cynical by her daily dances with death or seeing human tragedy (like the death of young people or babies) constantly - used her experiences to make her a more compassionate, life-affirming person. I finished this book wanting to meet June Nadle and have her over for tea. She is simply an intelligent, strong, and endearing woman that you feel privileged to have met as you turn the last page of her memoir.

She has managed to write about what some would consider an - at best, undesirable, and to most, a disturbing - job in a beautiful, uplifting way. There is little that is dismal in this book; quite a profound statement for a work that is almost exclusively about death and dying. Even when Nadle is retelling the most tragic stories, she always finds and shares a silver lining or muses that, at the very least, we must remember never to take life for granted; indeed, she reminds us that life is a beautiful, precious, fleeting thing.

In this way, June Nadle's treatise on working as an undertaker was, surprisingly, much more an affirmation of life than a narrative on death.

« Prev - Next »